Point One: The first thing that I want to mention from this chapter can be found within the second paragraph on the first page. It mentions that in some cases, funders are not looking to fund continuing plans and operations, but ones that are new. I think this complicates the compilation of a proposal because an individual could spend all this time compiling it to only be turned away due to interest. It also subliminally heightens the important surrounding research and networking. One would have more success if they are aware of what kinds of funding an organization has done in the past, whether it is general operating or new/expanding.
Point Two: The preparation around the proposal was something that also peaked my interest. I had always thought of proposal writing as “oh you just write the proposal and that’s that” when in actuality, that is far from true. The author details that before the proposal or cover letter are even considered being done, an organization must first prepare the planning sections. This includes the problem statement, goals, strategies, evaluation, program sustainability, and then budget. These components are essential before one considers the actual proposal because it evaluates whether the organizations plan is feasible. The chapter underlines that the worst thing one can do is present a proposal without a well thought out plan. It, in some cases, leads to funders not understanding the purpose of the proposal or feel unsure in whether it is feasible.
Point Three: The last point I want to raise about this chapter was how the proposal itself must be constructed with an extreme attention to detail. Also, an overall intentionality with every word. In todays day, the proposal submission is often submitted through online portals that come with capped word counts. So, it requires the proposal to say the most it can (and everything that is needed) in a confined space. For the writer, it means being intention with every single detail of the proposal from punctuation to every word in a sentence. Overall, I believe this section demonstrates how technology has both helped and limited the world of grant writing. There is the benefit of the sharing of information but the disadvantage of limited space for submission.
