In my own terms, I would define the humanities as a compilation of multiple areas of study with the purpose of organizing, understanding, and interpreting the world as we exist. It is important to note, as During also does, that this is a predominately Eurocentric or english-speaking view of the humanities. Their definition and compilation differs between geographic location and historical foundations. Furthermore, the humanities are founded in analysis, interpretation, critique, and construction rather than proving or disproving fact. Although facts and truth may be the foundation of these facets of the humanities, it is not what they seek to accomplish. During defines this idea of the humanities as they are “committed to secular truthfulness, defined as a “respect for truth” enacted in the “virtues” of accuracy and sincerity” (9). One can imagine During’s words, specifically the portion about truth, as similar to the construction of the scientific disciplines. Science depends on hard truths or falsities in order to find answers to the larger questions asked of the discipline. The idea of true or false ideas can demonstrate to outside viewers how the humanities interacts and even intersects with other fields of study. Where, in my opinion, the humanities becomes an outlier is when true or false does not matter (as long as one remains accurate in their claim). They can extend into the realm of belief and interpretation, yet still remain concrete in their reasoning. Overall, the humanities allow us to further understand the past while shaping our present and future society.
Journal #1 (Capstone)
